They say that you should never discuss religion or politics among friends and largely, I agree with that statement. Unless, of course, the friend you're discussing these "taboo" topics with happens to be my third guest blogger, Ms. Emilee Leach. Emilee is my favorite Facebook poster; She's a port of well-researched, level-headed awesome in a sea of mixed-up, one-sided crazy. Emilee is intelligent, articulate, but most importantly, she never fails to make me laugh my arse off. All that and she's a scientist too!
If you don't already know Emilee, you should fix this problem immediately. Start a conversation with her. She's open to new people, new topics, and new opinions. As long as you're not splattering on her wall, of course. Enjoy!
The Splatter on the Wall
By: Emilee Leach
From thoughts about
current events to religion, social networking sites have become the go-to place
to splatter one’s own opinion across their walls, and worse on the walls and
posts of others. I use the term splatter because so many rants that I see on
Facebook and Twitter, have absolutely no backing and there is no attempt to
provide support for the argument; people are simply splattering all over the
internet, in a stream of consciousness style, a way that makes me want to do
the same to my brain. Not to mention, most are inundated with so many typos and
grammatical errors, one has to wonder if that the person only had minutes to
live and felt the need to express their final opinion from their deathbed, OF
COURSE not having the time to proofread, use proper grammar, or at times make
any sense whatsoever. But the fact remains that sadly these people are not
dying, only dying to express their unsupported, uninvited opinion on some
issue.
To understand where I am
coming from and why this is such an infuriating practice, one should know some
basic information about me. I am a news junkie, a writer (What? Really?), a
science enthusiast, and one of the most outspoken and opinionated person you
will have the pleasure or dissatisfaction of meeting (just ask yourself on a
scale of 1-10, how narrow-minded are you? Anything over an 8 and I would go
with extreme dissatisfaction). Oh right… and should mention that I think I am funny, but that could and has
been disputed. I tend to be particularly vocal on issues pertaining to
politics, women’s rights, science v. religion, human rights, animal rights, and
current stories in the news. So basically, that is everything but what… gardening?
Finally and most importantly to the article, I consider myself to be an
excellent Facebook debater. And I don’t say this just because I want it to be
true. I feel like my proof comes not only from the ridiculous amount of
experience with it, but also the fact that my friends inviting me into their
conversations when they have an ignoramus splattering all over their page. I
believe they know that I can be trusted to do my research, be respectful, and
be unrelenting in continuing to participate in the conversation until it has
come to an end. Please notice that I did not claim to be a top arguer, because
I LOVE a good debate and feel that in most circumstances that it promotes
knowledge and understanding between people who do not see eye-to-eye on an
issue; however, I find there is absolutely no point in getting in an argument
with someone about my beliefs and opinions or theirs.
Because of the increased
amount of splattering I have seen as of late, especially over the George
Zimmerman case this week, I think it is worth examining some such cases and
looking at the lessons that may be applied, according to my newest initiative
that I am hereby deeming to be Chat Don’t Splat Act of Facebook 2013 (CDS Act
of FB 2013).
Let’s start with at a great example from last
week. I had posted that I was looking forward to it being October, so that I
may be able to finally have health insurance through Obamacare. While, I knew I
would probably have to take some heat from my Republican friends (who are
always more than willing to provide said “heat”), what I did not see coming was
this:
“The Obama
brotherhood=Muslim brotherhood! He gives more free stuff but some one has got
to pay for it. It ain't the rich but the working class. Liberals r socialist. I
really hope u don't fall for all the free stuff Obama is giving out cause while
one rejoices two or three or more r working their ass off to pay for it in
sweat and tears. But if u do I'm not mad at ya. I'm just sayin.”
Ok. Great. I am just
sayin’… SPLAT!!!!
Lessons to be applied as
they pertain to the CDP FB Act of 2013:
1.) Making an
outrageous claim, using insulting and poorly written language, and finalizing
with a condescending statement are not ways that going to help me understand
your point. It only makes me want to call you an idiot and move on with my
life.
2.) I recognize that we all have differing levels of
education, especially in the English department. That being said, it should be
noted that it is not a crime to TRY
to speak proper English, especially if you want someone to be able to
understand where you are coming from on a political issue with which you are
attempting to disagree. I KNOW that you know how to spell “you”…again… just
sayin’.
I bring up education
because segues perfectly into the next part of the discussion in regards the
ways that one should not splatter. This is a great example because it addresses
both the education issue and the religious aspect of the discussion. It was
actually a continuation of the rant that had started with the Muslim
Brotherhood. In this part of our long, painful, yet pointless conversation he
had asked me my beliefs. I tried desperately to get around it several times,
but as he kept probing, I eventually told him it was based in realm of science
and that I thought the Bible had a lot of really positive messages about how to
treat one and other, and also that I personally felt as though Jesus was a
notable historical figure, a philanthropist and a humanitarian, which per his
response was taken as me somehow defending the Bible. (Note: I really shouldn’t
have gotten into this one, such a waste of time and over 100 comments.) Anyhow
here’s the response:
“U made me feel stupid
because u r double minded. Your foundation is your own and can either go one
way when it suits u or the other when it suits u. U say u seek truth, but who's
truth. U say Jesus is a humanitarian like u like him but then u call him a
lier. What's up with that. U say u believe in creation but then say that god
could not have spoken it into being like the word says. U r half way on the
fence here do u see why I'm flustered at u right now. U bark at me to not speak
of this stuff cause u know u have no foundation and half way truths fall apart.
The word of God exposes u for who u r. Case in point. I'm sorry but truth is
truth right”.
More lessons to be
applied as they pertain to the CDP FB Act of 2013:
3.) When did I say I believed in “creation” (ism?) and
when did I call Jesus a liar? Oh yeah. I didn’t. Read what someone says before
responding. Please. It is hard to have a debate when you spend half the time
debating over what was has been said. All I am asking for, in this case, is
that before contributing your random splatter onto a post that you please first
read the comment to which you are splattering, I mean responding. Should I even
have to point this out? No. But sadly, I do. It may seem like common sense;
however, in my experience this is something that people do WAY too often.
4.)
Accept my right to believe in a different religion and please respect that I am
NOT looking to be converted. Why can you not empathize with this? It would seem
to me that your beliefs make you insanely desperate to show your love and ever
dying devotion on a person’s page that you barely even
know… so why can you not just
be happy with your very correct and unwavering opinion and leave mine alone. In short - “Thou shalt not proselytize on
Facebook”.
These are just four
simple examples of why we need the anti-splatter regulation, as addressed by
the rules of the CDS Act of FB 2013. Just abiding by these four suggestions
could provide some type solace from all the the idiotic splatter and honestly make
the internet a better place for all (who care to be involved in intelligent
conversation).
Two more quickies to
consider in regard to name-calling:
* Don’t call Democrats -
Obama-loving, drone kissing, socialist, welfare-loving, baby killing liberals.
* Don’t call Republicans
– Bush-lovin’, women hating, bible thumping, pro-life gun crazies.
It makes you sound
ignorant. More or less, I find it similar to calling someone a “stupid-face” on
the playground.
There will always be
those who will break the laws outlined in the CDS Act of Facebook 2013 and will
continue to make Facebook and the internet a less-intelligent/enjoyable place
to interact with each other. I would be delusional if I really thought EVERYONE
would actually post well-researched, respectful, intelligent ideas on my page
and the page of others.
But seriously, how nice would that be?